UN
NGOs capitalize on ideological and political antagonism within the UN to bring their anti-Israel campaigns to the international stage. The devastating impact of NGOs is compounded by the institutional bias of UN bodies, such as the Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on Palestinian issues, and biased “fact-finding” missions.
NGOs vs. Goldstone: NGO Monitor Analysis
Goldstones Washington Post op-ed, retracting the substance of the UNHRC Goldstone Report, undermines the credibility of the NGOs that provided the false allegations. In response, NGOs and NGO officials have issued numerous statements distorting and rewriting Goldstones words, in an effort to preserve their credibility.
Topics
Middle East Democracy vs. NGO-UN Mini-Durban Conference
Another UN "mini-Durban" conference, held under the auspices of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People. European- and NIF-funded groups are participating.
Topics
NGO and Goldstone Casualty Claims Contradicted
Problematic and unsupported NGO casualty statistics were repeated in the media, the Goldstone Report, and other NGO publications. Will they be re-evaluated?
Topics
The Role of John Ging, UNRWA Director in Gaza, in Political Warfare
John Ging has been the head of UNRWA in Gaza since 2006. In this role, Ging has promoted political warfare targeting Israel.
Topics
NGO Monitor Submission to UN Human Rights Committee
On July 13 and 14, 2010, Israel was reviewed by the United Nations Human Rights Committee as part of its periodic review of country compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. To highlight the activity of NGOs in furthering the delegitimization of Israel within UN frameworks, in contrast to upholding the norms of universal human rights, NGO Monitor submitted its own report to the Committee.