The Gaza Aid-Terror Cover Up: NGOs Whitewash the Evidence
After being implicated in the report, “Puppet Regime: Hamas' Coercive Grip on Aid and NGO Operations in Gaza,” many NGOs have attempted to rebut the findings.
As part of the “Durban Strategy” to isolate Israel, NGOs level accusations of systematic Israeli violations of Palestinian human rights. The NGO allegations are characterized by factual and legal distortions, in pursuit of an anti-human rights agenda.
After being implicated in the report, “Puppet Regime: Hamas' Coercive Grip on Aid and NGO Operations in Gaza,” many NGOs have attempted to rebut the findings.
From the opening moments of the war that began on February 28, 2026, the highly politicized NGO network immediately launched predictable and often absurd condemnations of the U.S. and Israel for ostensible “aggression” and “violations of international law.”
WESPAC’s IRS Form 990 covering fiscal year September 2023–August 2024, providing highly technical financial information, illustrates the organization’s central role in the orchestrated anti-Israel demonization campaigns that were launched in the United States in the immediate aftermath of the Oct 7th Hamas attacks.
Act X Palestine (AXP) is a coalition of Palestinian and international NGOs that collaborate on political advocacy and fundraising campaigns targeting Israel, primarily in Catalonia.
In November 2025, Kairos Palestine – which describes itself as a “Christian Palestinian movement” – published a second theological-political manifesto, “Moment of Truth: Faith in the Time of Genocide.”
Despite the blatant rise in antisemitism, Amnesty International Australia, which claims to “challenge injustice wherever it happens,” has consistently vilified and actively opposed measures intended to protect Australian Jews.
WESPAC has been at the center of controversy due to its fiscal sponsorship of disruptive, and at times violent, anti-Israel and antisemitic activities in the aftermath of the Oct. 7th attacks.
Many of the activities and projects undertaken by Swisspeace are highly politicized, reflecting ideological preferences, prejudices and biases that can interfere with the organization’s stated objectives. In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the biases are highly visible.