15 November 2005:
CIDA: Canadian Reactions to NGO Monitor Report
Click here
for printer friendly version
Summary: NGO Monitor's report,
"Assessing
Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) Funding for Political
NGOs", triggered significant discussion in Canada.
A November 7 article entitled "Canada's
Unholy Alliance" in the conservative online Front Page Magazine
called attention to CIDA funding for KAIROS, a pro-Palestinian Christian
group promoting divestment: "This is the shame of the Government
of Canada; extending financial support for an anti-Semitic, anti-Israel
cabal which flies in the face of Canadian foreign policy."
An October 27 op-ed entitled "Taxpayer-funded
church coalition calling for divestment of Israel", in the Canada
Free Press quotes Dr. Charles McVety, President of Canada Christian
College: "'It is outrageous that the Liberal government would support
a group that would call for divesting from Israel with $2.9 million
of Canadian taxpayers' money and side with the Palestinians.'"
MP Stockwell Day, Foreign Affairs Critic for the opposition Conservative
party in the Canadian federal parliament, called on the government
re-examine where CIDA funding is being directed. "It is inappropriate
for taxpayer dollars that are supposed to be used for humanitarian
aid to be directed at campaigns attacking Israel."
All three focused on CIDA funding for the divestment campaign involving
KAIROS, the Mennonite Central Committee, and (via MCC) for Sabeel,
which held a three-day conference promoting divestment in Toronto
from October 26-29. Speakers included Sabeel founding director Naim
Ateek and ICAHD director Jeff Halper. "Eleonora Karabatic, a spokesperson
for the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), said no
tax dollars were spent on the Sabeel conference. … She said KAIROS,
a coalition of church groups committed to social justice issues,
receives funds from CIDA but that strict rules prohibit spending
for partisan or political purposes. … She said the federal agency
funds KAIROS 'but for other programs.'" NGO Monitor notes that the
question was not whether CIDA funded this conference directly, but
rather whether CIDA was providing support for NGOs that promote
the divestment campaign.
|
|
|